Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4% regression in memory.top_7_stress at 382134:382165 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionNot 100% sure if this is real. Will see what the bisects find if anything.
,
Mar 21 2016
This is likely due to me flipping on the variations for the unified media pipeline: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?rev=382165 This actually looks like an improvement per the graph, not a regression?
,
Mar 21 2016
Oh I see, the improvement is some revisions before (unfortunately for me :) In either case, this wasn't entirely unexpected, we're now allocating memory that was previously uncounted by Chrome (since it was listed in Android system MediaServer process).
,
Mar 21 2016
Are we looking at the same thing? I'm seeing a nice 10% improvement followed by a possible 1.4% regression. The latter is what I'm looking into :)
,
Mar 21 2016
Yeah I got too excited and thought this was pointing at the improvement :)
,
Mar 21 2016
OK if this was expected, feel free to close :)
,
Mar 21 2016
Will wait for bisect to come back and then relabel and close as wontfix if it points to my change.
,
Mar 21 2016
,
Mar 21 2016
,
Mar 25 2016
This is within expectations, so marking as WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Mar 21 2016