Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.5%-27.4% regression in webrtc.datachannel at 380593:380630 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 15 2016
Kicked off bisect for this since my variations change was in range.
,
Mar 15 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author keishi@chromium.org === Hi keishi@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Add threshold for V8Followup-IdleGC Author : keishi Commit description: The V8Followup-IdleGC seems to be triggering a lot of GCs with low collection count. BUG=None Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1782833005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#380607} Commit : d2466040fdea5f25406f9c6ac07efab10c46548d Date : Fri Mar 11 12:20:11 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@380605 12666.666667336.725407 9 good chromium@380606 12837.5 101.978989 8 good chromium@380607 13431.5 324.4437 8 bad chromium@380609 13495.2 371.326272 5 bad chromium@380612 13391.5 356.04454 8 bad chromium@380619 13601.0 90.503354 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 594435 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.getusermedia Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_renderer/vm_private_dirty_final_renderer Relative Change: 7.31% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/524 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9018102213155643040 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 22 2016
based on comment#3, keishi@ could you please check the issue.
,
Mar 29 2016
keishi: ping
,
Mar 29 2016
r380607 decreased the occurance of BlinkGC, thus it is expected that the memory usage at the end of the test might increase. There should be no problem unless it increases the peack memory usage. Marking as WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kouhei@chromium.org
, Mar 14 2016