Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
processor intensive scripts often incorrectly trigger 'aw snap' instead of the unresponsive page invitation
Reported by
john.atw...@gmail.com,
Mar 9 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||
Issue description
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/49.0.2623.75 Safari/537.36
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Run any working processor-intensive script
2. Occasionally instead of the prompt to wait for it to finish, the browser gives the 'aw snap' message and the script is incorrectly terminated
What is the expected behavior?
The unresponsive page warning should appear including the 'wait' prompt to give the user the option of letting the script finish
Note: the debug log is from when this script was embedded in a larger page, but I am sure that the crash was because this script did not finish in time.
What went wrong?
Chrome crashed
Crashed report ID: sorry ('crash reporting is disabled')
How much crashed? Just one tab
Is it a problem with a plugin? N/A
Did this work before? Yes Always
Chrome version: 49.0.2623.75 Channel: beta
OS Version: 6.3
Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 20.0 r0
Hi, I've attached a script and also a chrome_debug.log. The log file is from when this one function was being called in a larger page, I have extracted the offending script so you can see it. The problem is *intermittent* but affects all computers, so I hope it is helpful to see the errors which it generated during this crash.
,
Mar 9 2016
OK I ran it with crash reporting enabled, and here is the crash report number Crash ID 6394a73400000000 (9580b757-58f8-4455-8d29-c95c9829b898) Also, *crucially* the reason I'm reporting this is because it affects web workers, where it is really hard to trace and diagnose.
,
Mar 10 2016
Issue 593444 has been merged into this issue.
,
Mar 10 2016
Able to reproduce this on the latest stable(49.0.2623.87) and the latest canary(51.0.2673.0) on Windows-7, Mac OS 10.11.3 and Linux Ubuntu 14.04. This is a regression issue broken in M-35. Last good build: 35.0.1911.0 First bad build: 35.0.1912.0 Changelog: ============ https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/629ec27203654b8b8e02bd5b03814a4ce86cb97c..6b18e04de9b05cb956a69f2537f0bceb92109493 Suspecting: https://codereview.chromium.org/206783004 Looks like rvargas@ is doing something else hence assigning to kinuko@(one of the reviewers) for help in investigating this further. Feel free to re-assign if the change is not related. Thank you!
,
Mar 10 2016
Just to say, a comment on the corresponding issue 593444 correctly said it looks like an oom issue. When I run my program while watching the windows task manager memory manager, I can see the memory filling up. This is not a chrome bug ... should I withdraw the bug report somehow? It would be nice if there were some sort of error in chrome_debug.log to help developers, but there is no bug in chrome. John |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by john.atw...@gmail.com
, Mar 9 2016936 bytes
936 bytes View Download
52.5 KB
52.5 KB View Download