Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
24.6% regression in page_cycler.morejs at 378763:378796 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@378762 863.724792 10.513811 12 good chromium@378796 851.180347 22.737338 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 591798 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.morejs Test Metric: warm_times/page_load_time Relative Change: 2.54% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/502 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9019176755917219456 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 11 2016
Bisect re-kicked with wider revision range. Details on the below link: ------------------------- https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=591798 Thank you!
,
Mar 13 2016
Automatic message: All alerts recovered. Graphs: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=591798
,
Mar 21 2016
Looks like the alerts are recovered, can we close the issue. lanwei@, Could you please check the issue and suggest.
,
Mar 21 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com
, Mar 3 2016