Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.8% regression in page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he at 378963:378974 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 17 2016
Started bisect here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9017928090410387200 The last one was successful, but it looks like the output has expired, and it didn't update the bug...
,
Mar 17 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@380889 71264.083333712.362453 12 good chromium@378973 70578.5 372.556036 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 591766 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_renderer/http___ynet.co.il_ Relative Change: 1.50% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/2851 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9017928090410387200 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 25 2016
This memory usage increase in follows shortly after a decrease -- this is a revert of a recent apparent improvement, and in general we don't follow up on this kind of case. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com
, Mar 3 2016