Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.4% regression in startup.warm.blank_page at 378772:378796 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@378771 92.694737 0.205196 5 good chromium@378778 92.757895 0.43814 5 good chromium@378781 92.894737 0.539313 5 good chromium@378784 98.063158 0.258913 5 bad chromium@378796 98.042105 1.029617 5 bad Bisect job ran on: win_8_perf_bisect Bug ID: 591765 Test Command: python src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests startup.warm.blank_page Test Metric: window_display_time/window_display_time Relative Change: 5.77% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/1864 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9019184435201060592 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 11 2016
Bisect re-kicked with wider revision range. Details on the below link: ------------------------- https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=591765 Thank you!
,
Mar 11 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author robliao@chromium.org === Hi robliao@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Revert of Make the EarlyInitStartup Code Default (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1453923002/ ) Author : robliao Commit description: Reason for revert: Reverting - Looks like we can't easily get perf data from the bots. Original issue's description: > Make the EarlyInitStartup Code Default > > We're satisfied with the performance characteristics of running Extension > Feature Initialization on a background thread that we'd like to do it > all the time now. > > BUG= 470743 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/697fb4718088e9b87a30f21f57168af70ef273ae > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#360352} > > Committed: https://crrev.com/9b13cbdc3205421a28bd583878c1108ed0eaead0 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#378308} TBR=jochen@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG= 470743 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1749213005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#378782} Commit : 088106bebeac47281eb94ec5af24f5205b4819a1 Date : Wed Mar 02 18:42:40 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@378710 92.75 0.934825 12 good chromium@378752 94.394737 4.785423 12 good chromium@378768 93.526316 0.789474 5 good chromium@378776 94.280702 2.584394 12 good chromium@378780 94.635965 4.319724 12 good chromium@378781 92.8 0.359671 5 good chromium@378782 98.692982 0.932589 12 bad chromium@378784 98.95614 1.944824 12 bad chromium@378860 98.756579 1.700564 8 bad Bisect job ran on: win_8_perf_bisect Bug ID: 591765 Test Command: python src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests startup.warm.blank_page Test Metric: window_display_time/window_display_time Relative Change: 7.24% Score: 99.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/1878 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9018506127770900368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 15 2016
This CL is a revert. The associated code is not in the codebase anymore.
,
Mar 15 2016
I'll also note this is expect as this is a performance improvement CL. The main mystery that remains is crbug.com/558432 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com
, Mar 3 2016