Themed inactive tabs are not colored correctly |
||
Issue descriptionVersion: 51.0.2664.0 OS: 10.11.3 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Install https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/greyscale/olagifopidokilmoeiiejpmpfclmopfk 2. Open multiple tabs 3. Inactive tabs are the wrong color, both when the window is active and when it is inactive What is the expected output? What do you see instead? See screenshot for current state. This is basically the same as issue 585867 . See that bug for how the tabs should look. Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
,
Mar 2 2016
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/1ce82ea96b06b419a7c82090cd4c561d6bb11da4 commit 1ce82ea96b06b419a7c82090cd4c561d6bb11da4 Author: shrike <shrike@chromium.org> Date: Wed Mar 02 17:35:19 2016 Fix regression in background tab color (Mac). When merging my Material Design changes for the Mac tab strip I mis- merged this one important change, part of the fix for the regression in crbug.com/585867 . BUG= 591057 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1756643002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#378768} [modify] https://crrev.com/1ce82ea96b06b419a7c82090cd4c561d6bb11da4/chrome/browser/themes/theme_properties.cc
,
Mar 2 2016
,
Mar 4 2016
I'm still seeing this in today's canary 51.0.2667.0.
,
Mar 4 2016
It's working for me in 51.0.2667.0 (see screenshot). You mentioned in the crbug/585867 that theme images are cached, so perhaps you're just seeing old images from the cache?
,
Mar 4 2016
Ah, yes, if I reinstall the theme it works.
,
Mar 14 2016
Friendly ping? When will this go live? I am still seeing this on 51.0.2673.0 (Official Build) canary (64-bit) on Mac OS X 10.11.3
,
Mar 14 2016
This is already live and confirmed fixed. Please be sure to empty your cache.
,
Mar 14 2016
In https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/954f76a1bde641fc6331167282fd91e2697a7993%5E%21/#F0, the CL also bumped the theme pack version to invalidate the cache. Maybe we should do that for this.
,
Mar 15 2016
So should this be reopened to implement the invalidation?
,
Mar 15 2016
> So should this be reopened to implement the invalidation? No - I have filed bug 594892 for that. |
||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||
Comment 1 by shrike@chromium.org
, Mar 1 2016