Reported by laukst...@gmail.com, Jan 30 2016
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/48.0.2564.97 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: AppCache is deprecated and removed from spec and instead recommended to use Service Workers. What is the expected behavior? What went wrong? https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsers.html#offline > This feature is in the process of being removed from the Web platform. (This is a long process that takes many years.) Using any of the offline Web application features at this time is highly discouraged. Use service workers instead. Did this work before? N/A Chrome version: 48.0.2564.97 Channel: stable OS Version: 10.0 Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 20.0 r0 Firefox 44 shows deprecation warning https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/44#Service_Workers and son will remove its support completely https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1237782, https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Using_the_application_cache
Feb 1 2016,
Looks like a feature request, Untriaging it so that it gets addressed.
Feb 3 2016,
Mar 15 2016,
+Joel who removed appcache from insecure origins. @Joel, is there a timeline for removing AppCache on secure origins?
Mar 15 2016,
Not that I know of, but I'd happy to see it happen :-) Adding slightlyoff@ and jakearchibald@ who can hopefully give me a security reason to intent to remove it (or just declare that it's a good idea to do so). It's much, much too early to really tell with these stats (they were only added a few weeks ago), but the good news is that the usage stats I added for AppCache look very low on secure origins: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/popularity#ApplicationCacheAPISecureOrigin https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/popularity#ApplicationCacheManifestSelectSecureOrigin
Mar 16 2016,
Apr 7 2016,
Given Safari doesn't even support Service Workers yet, is there a markup approach way to disable AppCache when both Service Workers and AppCache are available?
Apr 7 2016,
Appcache is ignored for urls that are within scope of a service worker.
Apr 9 2016,
> Adding slightlyoff@ and jakearchibald@ who can hopefully give me a security reason to intent to remove it (or just declare that it's a good idea to do so). @jaffathecake's security reason for removal: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1237782#c34 also, for those effected & looking for a quick fix, Kenneth Rhode Christensen has a service worker for polyfilling app cache. https://github.com/kenchris/jakecache
Feb 23 2017,
This issue has been Available for over a year. If it's no longer important or seems unlikely to be fixed, please consider closing it out. If it is important, please re-triage the issue. Sorry for the inconvenience if the bug really should have been left as Available. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
@sheriffbot, this needs to be solved since isn't anymore a part of the spec, AppCache is depreciated.
Status: waiting on big customers to finish migrating to Service Workers. Can maybe start putting a roadmap together to warn developers away.
Sign in to add a comment