|Issue 446050||Implement Descendant Combinator ">>"|
|Starred by 12 users||Reported by rodneyr...@gmail.com, Jan 4 2015||Back to list|
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2266.0 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: CSS Selectors Level 4 - http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors-4/#descendant-combinators What is the expected behavior? What went wrong? While "foo >> bar" and "foo bar" are functionally the same, the ">>" selector is supposed to bridge the gap between ">" (child combinator) and ">>>" (shadow-piercing descendant combinator) Did this work before? No Chrome version: 41.0.2266.0 Channel: canary OS Version: OS X 10.8.5 Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 16.0 r0
Jan 6 2015,
Jan 12 2015,
Mar 3 2015,
[AUTO] Moving all non essential bugs to the next Milestone. (This decision is based on the labels attached to your ticket.) Ref: https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/ticket-milestone-punting-1
Apr 14 2015,
[AUTO] This issue has already been moved once and is lower than Priority 1,therefore removing mstone.
May 6 2015,
May 6 2015,
May 5 2016,
This issue has been available for more than 365 days, and should be re-evaluated. Hotlist-Recharge-Cold label is added for tracking. Please re-triage this issue. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
May 8 2016,
May 9 2016,
This feature has been implemented in the current Safari Technology Preview version: http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-descendant-gtgt
Nov 28 2016,
FYI - '>>>' (shadow-piercing descendant combinator) for static profile was implemented under experimental web platform features flag in issue 633007 .
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/641 "[selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?"
|► Sign in to add a comment|