| Put min/max/close on the left on Ubuntu Lucid (when it's configured that way) | ||||||||
| Project Member Reported by evan@chromium.org, Mar 26 2010 | Back to list | |||||||
As in summary. We can query metacity for this info.
,
Mar 26 2010
estade noted we need to put the spy guy on the right in incognito mode in this case.
,
Mar 26 2010
also make sure that fitt's law still applies to the close button in maximized mode
,
Apr 12 2010
Issue 41211 has been merged into this issue.
,
Apr 13 2010
I make this. Is only a mockup. But looks great. Order of the buttons on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx: Close, min, max. (The same that Mac OS X)
,
Apr 14 2010
Here is another screenshot from Ubuntu Lucid beta2. Please note that in beta1->beta2 the button order has changed again. Now (since beta2) the buttons match MacOSX completely.
,
Apr 14 2010
We probably shouldn't do anything until Lucid settles down. ;)
,
Apr 16 2010
Issue 41479 has been merged into this issue.
,
Apr 30 2010
Ubuntu Lucid Lynx is out! The official order of the buttons are on the left: Close, Min, Max.
,
Apr 30 2010
yes, this should be aligned with other applications, in Lucid it means left!
,
May 3 2010
It is indeed a hassle in Ubuntu, i have Lucid installed and all my buttons are on the left. Since i have a wide screen and most of my windows do not fill the whole screen i have to constantly remember that chromium buttons are now on the wrong side of the screen and that makes it troublesome to quickly close all my windows when cleaning up my workspace, see attached screenshot. I get the idea that the devs want it consistent throughout the whole platform, but consistency in one OS preceeds that imho, since users normally only use one OS at a time. And it now eats away at usability...
,
May 3 2010
I would suggest to create another package for Ubuntu which should have buttons on the left and leave the regular Debian package for the ones who like buttons on the right. Would be good of course to have the buttons and the title to have colors and style similar to Ubuntu's. They've managed to make it really good looking and refreshing this time.
,
May 5 2010
Just upgraded to 5.0.375.29 beta and it looks like devs are trying a more integrated look on Ubuntu. Nice touch, Chrome doesn't look so prominently alien on Ubuntu. However, must point out (no offense intended) Opera's new beta for Linux fully integrates with Ubuntu desktop and launches just as fast.
,
May 10 2010
,
May 10 2010
@14 Actually, we care more about consistency with the host platform. We already use the mac osx button ordering on OSX and intend to do the same on linux. The reason this wasn't done for Mstone-5 all came down to timing of the Lucid release vs. the timing of Mstone- 5 stabilization.
,
May 13 2010
The following revision refers to this bug:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=47195
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r47195 | erg@chromium.org | 2010-05-13 14:36:59 -0700 (Thu, 13 May 2010) | 13 lines
Changed paths:
M http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/gtk/browser_titlebar.cc?r1=47195&r2=47194
M http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/gtk/browser_titlebar.h?r1=47195&r2=47194
A http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/gtk/gconf_titlebar_listener.cc
A http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/gtk/gconf_titlebar_listener.h
M http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/chrome_browser.gypi?r1=47195&r2=47194
GTK: Support Ambiance/Radiance and Dust button ordering.
When running under GNOME, read the gconf key that defines the button placement
and lay the close, minimize and maximize buttons out. This can even handle
bizarre combinations like putting the close button on the left and the
minimize/maximize buttons on the right.
When running under anything else, use the default button ordering.
BUG= 39406
TEST=none
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/2095001
------------------------------------------------------------------------
,
May 13 2010
,
May 15 2010
nice fix! thanks :)
,
Mar 23 2011
,
Oct 13 2012
This issue has been closed for some time. No one will pay attention to new comments. If you are seeing this bug or have new data, please click New Issue to start a new bug.
,
Mar 10 2013
,
Mar 13 2013
|
||||||||
| ► Sign in to add a comment | ||||||||
Status: Available