| Latest release pulls a lot more packages than before | ||||||||
| Reported by nao...@gmail.com, Feb 13 2010 | Back to list | |||||||
Chrome Version (from the about:version page): 5.0.322.2-r38810 OS + version: Debian unstable Upgrading from 5.0.307.5-r37950 to 5.0.322.2-r38810, using the Debian package: The following NEW packages will be installed: alien{a} libelf1{a} libqt3-mt{a} libqt4-gui{a} libqt4-sql-sqlite{a} librpm0{a} librpmbuild0{a} librpmio0{a} lsb{a} lsb-core{a} lsb-cxx{a} lsb- desktop{a} lsb-graphics{a} pax{a} rpm{a} rpm-common{a} rpm2cpio{a} time{a} The following packages will be upgraded: google-chrome-unstable 1 packages upgraded, 18 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. Need to get 21.1MB/21.2MB of archives. After unpacking 15.3MB will be used. Is it really necessary to now depends on lsb, instead lsb-base? (like on 5.0.307.5-r37950)
Comment 1
by
mightyia...@gmail.com,
Feb 13 2010
,
Feb 13 2010
The following NEW packages will be installed:
alien{a} heirloom-mailx{a} libqt4-gui{a} libqt4-sql-sqlite{a} librpm0{a}
librpmbuild0{a} librpmio0{a} lsb{a} lsb-core{a} lsb-cxx{a} lsb-desktop{a}
lsb-graphics{a} ncurses-term{a} pax{a} postfix{a} rpm{a}
The following packages will be upgraded:
google-chrome-unstable
1 packages upgraded, 16 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 18.6MB of archives. After unpacking 16.2MB will be used.
,
Feb 13 2010
I'm seeing this too.
,
Feb 13 2010
Issue 35685 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 13 2010
,
Feb 14 2010
This seems like a simple oversight.
,
Feb 16 2010
Issue 35824 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 16 2010
mdm also complained. He said, "chrome now depends on CVS and also alien and rpm and qt4 and m4". Not sure what Debian-based distro he's on though.
,
Feb 16 2010
I run Ubuntu, and I had to install alien, rpm, various qt4 packages and a mail client. That's the updates for my Debian-based distro at least.
,
Feb 16 2010
thestig: the machine I was talking about is Ubuntu 8.04, but it's the same in 9.10 and presumably most or all other Debian derivatives.
,
Feb 17 2010
Issue 36001 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 17 2010
Issue chromium-os:1594 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 17 2010
This was an attempt to consolidate our DEB deps on the more generic 'lsb' package (similar to what the RPM packages use). Unfortunately, that pulls in a lot of stuff that isn't installed by default on some DEB distros, so I'm reverting to the 'lsb- base' dependency we had before.
,
Feb 17 2010
,
Feb 17 2010
Issue 36045 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 18 2010
Issue 36076 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 18 2010
If it's possible, can we cherry-pick this onto the beta branch?
,
Feb 18 2010
The same issue exists on the beta branch where Chrome wants me to install 44 extra packages. Ubuntu 9.10 Google Chrome 5.0.307.7 beta
,
Feb 18 2010
It is cherry-picked for beta, but it missed the current build.
,
Feb 18 2010
To get around it for now, download the deb file and use dpkg to install with the following. This will ignore the dependency issues and configure the browser. I wouldn't make this practice going forward. Ubuntu/Debian is pretty forgiving and a browser is far from a core library/package on your system. dpkg -i --force depends google-chrome-unstable_current_i386.deb
,
Feb 18 2010
Issue 36139 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 18 2010
I'm glad to see that this is fixed -- but does that mean that it will uninstall all these unneeded packages that it installed for me as well on Ubuntu? Or do I have to try and remember the 44 some-odd packages that it "depended" on and uninstall each one by myself?
,
Feb 18 2010
After installing the next version, 'apt-get' should prompt you that there are packages which are no longer needed, and 'apt-get autoremove' should clean them up.
,
Feb 19 2010
I uninstalled Chrome after it installed all these packages, but 'sudo apt-get autoremove' didn't clean it.
,
Feb 19 2010
I'm still getting the dependency issue in channel deb http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/ stable main Should I be using a different one?
,
Feb 19 2010
,
Feb 19 2010
That's what I was asking, thanks.
,
Feb 21 2010
have same problem in karmic, i had google-chrome-unstable, but it asked me to install all this stuff like two weeks ago... I'm on an EEEPC 4G, and I have little disk... so I canceled, uninstalled and reinstalled but: google-chrome-beta, which didn't asked me those dependencies... till next week... Now I want to figure out this. So, I was using always sudo apt-get update && sudo aptitude full-upgrade to update my system, this is faster and less resource-demanding than synaptic/update manager. But I turned again to synaptic, so as to unmark in a clarifying menu all the unwanted updates (rpm, alien, etc)... I was able to do it yesterday, tried to block version on google- chrome-beta until they repair this, that I think must be a mistake on dependencies, but I have had done sthg wrong, because today i repeated sudo apt-get update && sudo aptitude full-upgrade, but it still wants to update google-chrome-beta with all that enormous unwanted staff... I will have to stuck with synaptic and "GUI manual unmarking"... until this matter stops
,
Feb 21 2010
@Gabriel: please see the postings in this bug report, this is a packaging issue and it will be fixed. In the meantime, your best bets are either to uninstall Chrome for now and use something else until it is fixed, or upgrade selectively with Synaptic/KPackageKit, which is what I am doing: just ignore the Chrome upgrade for now.
,
Feb 22 2010
What I'm horrified by is that 5.0.307.9 hasn't been taken off the repo.
,
Feb 23 2010
Verified as fixed on linux (Ubuntu 8.04 -debian unstable and Open Suse 11.1(rpm - unstable builds): Google Chrome 5.0.322.2 (Official Build 38810) dev WebKit 533.1 V8 2.1.0.1 User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.322.2 Safari/533.1
,
Feb 23 2010
,
Feb 23 2010
"Verified as fixed on linux (Ubuntu 8.04 -debian unstable and Open Suse 11.1(rpm - unstable builds): Google Chrome 5.0.322.2 (Official Build 38810) dev" Actually 5.0.322.2-r38810 is the _problematic_ version.
,
Feb 23 2010
Not fixed at all... $ apt-cache policy google-chrome-unstable google-chrome-unstable: Installed: (none) Candidate: 5.0.322.2-r38810 Version table: 5.0.322.2-r38810 0 500 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages $ apt-get install google-chrome-unstable Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: alien at libelf1 libqt3-mt libqt4-assistant libqt4-gui libqt4-sql-sqlite librpm0 librpmbuild0 librpmio0 lsb lsb-core lsb-cxx lsb-desktop lsb-graphics m4 ncurses-term pax rpm rpm-common rpm2cpio time Suggested packages: lsb-rpm libqt3-mt-psql libqt3-mt-mysql libqt3-mt-odbc libqt4-dev lsb-printing lsb-multimedia lsb-languages elfutils rpm-i18n The following NEW packages will be installed alien at google-chrome-unstable libelf1 libqt3-mt libqt4-assistant libqt4-gui libqt4-sql-sqlite librpm0 librpmbuild0 librpmio0 lsb lsb-core lsb-cxx lsb-desktop lsb-graphics m4 ncurses-term pax rpm rpm-common rpm2cpio time 0 upgraded, 23 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 22.4MB of archives. After this operation, 73.8MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n Abort.
,
Feb 23 2010
rekhas: OpenSuse was never a problem (RPM distros bring in all these extra LSB packages already). The problem on DEB-based distros will be fixed with a build after r39250.
,
Feb 24 2010
Back to normal with 5.0.335.0 (Official Build 39561) dev under Debian Lenny Many thanks for fixing this issue!
,
Feb 27 2010
@Comment 24 by henkjan.sleijster: Same here: google-chrome-beta 5.0.307.11-r39572 does not depend on all these extra packages, which is good, but "apt-get autoremove" doesn't clean up the mess. This is in Kubuntu-lucid. I am lucky I installed the bad package from the command line and saved the output, so I was able to remove them by hand. But this really depends on your local installation. For me, the clean up was a matter of sudo apt-get remove alien bsd-mailx libqt4-gui lsb lsb-core lsb-cxx lsb-desktop lsb- graphics mailx ncurses-term pax postfix I actually tried, for the benefit of others, to just remove lsb and then run apt-get autoremove, but that didn't work, either.
,
Feb 28 2010
About the removal of no longer needed automatically installed packages, 'aptitude' does a much better job of that than apt-get.
,
Mar 3 2010
It seems first update after installing fresh 9.10 and Chrome triggers a postfix update failure warning dialog on some systems; see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/526785 So there's even more harm than just the extra downloads.
,
Mar 3 2010
About https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/526785, no. It's not related with Chrome.
,
Mar 3 2010
I could be wrong, but I thought installing lsb pulled in postfix.
,
Mar 3 2010
I believe it pulls in mail-transfer-agent which the virtual package resolution process decides is best satisfied by postfix.
,
Nov 26 2010
I've read comments up thru #42, and see no recent activity, so this might not be the place to post a comment. A few minutes ago, I went the "popular" path and tried to install Chrome for 64-bit openSUSE. All went well for a few seconds, and then (yet again*) I got a dependency failure -- a list of maybe 15 missing libraries. That has been the history ever since Chrome was offered for Linux; I'm sadly disappointed that such a savvy org. as Google doesn't offer packages.
,
Nov 29 2010
nbodley: This bug is very unlikely to be related to your issue. But do open a new issue for it, and provide as much information as you can about the problem so we can help to figure out why it's not working for you. Thanks.
,
Nov 30 2010
For [mdm]: First, I must apologize; I think I was overtired, and failed to notice that I had downloaded a .rpm file. Second, I'll probably be busy for a few days, and hope I won't forget! Typically, what happens is as I described -- install seems to run fine, until it's stopped dead by dependency failures -- missing libraries. openSUSE 11.1 has some corrupted executable code, which could conceivably cause the problem. Although very likely unrelated, selecting "Num Lock" does not enable keypad numerial input; that's one example of corrupted executable code. I hope to reinstall Linux (perhaps several distros.; am having a bitchy time getting sound to work). If I can't install Chrome into (perhaps more than one) distro., I'll do my best to provide details. Regards, [nb]
,
Nov 30 2010
I added a comment to the thread on this bug. Hope to be able to help more, in a few days.
,
Mar 23 2011
,
Oct 13 2012
This issue has been closed for some time. No one will pay attention to new comments. If you are seeing this bug or have new data, please click New Issue to start a new bug. |
||||||||
| ► Sign in to add a comment | ||||||||