| REGRESSION: sad tab on http://www.hadess.net (and others, include google maps) | ||||||||
| Project Member Reported by evan@chromium.org, Jan 15 2010 | Back to list | |||||||
Page seems to render, then crash. Regression range: http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/dashboard/ui/changelog.html? url=/trunk/src&range=36263:36342 The backtrace makes no sense -- all the addresses are in the stack, not in the code. This makes me suspect the v8 roll ager did. Linux 64.
Comment 1
by
evan@chromium.org,
Jan 15 2010
,
Jan 15 2010
Oh, and the other addresses (7fffc 7fffe) 00007fffc0000000 1000K rwx-- [ anon ] 00007fffc00fa000 523288K ----- [ anon ] 00007fffe0000000 1024K rw--- [ anon ] 00007fffe0100000 15360K ----- [ anon ] 00007fffe1000000 1024K rw--- [ anon ] 00007fffe1100000 48128K ----- [ anon ] 00007fffe4000000 420K rw--- [ anon ] 00007fffe4069000 65116K ----- [ anon ]
,
Jan 17 2010
,
Jan 18 2010
It seems that we have more of these websites that suddenly are no longer working : e.g. http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html, www.farmville.com, Also searching on maps.google.com delivers the sad smiley
,
Jan 18 2010
,
Jan 18 2010
Don't know if it's the good place, but same for me, including many other sites: iGoogle, http://dev.chromium.org/ (what a shame...), http://www.simplicime.com/, http://www.vodkaster.com/, http://www.jiwa.fr/, http://www.canonrumors.com/, http://www.dpreview.com/, ...... Starting with a fresh user account does not change anything. Tested on Archlinux 64 and Chromium 4.0.302.0 (36495)
,
Jan 19 2010
Bill or Lasse, could one of you guys have a look at this one?
,
Jan 19 2010
One more information, there is no problem with my Ubuntu 32bits install with chromium 4.0.302.0 (36505) (from ppa, not the official repo). I would be more incline to suspect the 64 vs 32 version rather than official repo/ubuntu build, because someone on Arch recompiled completely chromium and still got the problem. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31368 for the topic on chromium install on Archlinux.
,
Jan 19 2010
Problem has been reproduced, and tracked down. Some new remembered-set code in V8 did not mark the rax register as used, and overwrote a pointer. Will be fixed immediately.
,
Jan 19 2010
Problem has been reproduced, and tracked down. Some new remembered-set code in V8 did not mark the rax register as used, and overwrote a pointer. Will be fixed immediately.
,
Jan 19 2010
Issue 32493 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jan 19 2010
Issue 32562 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jan 20 2010
By immediately, do you mean like government immediately (which could be any time from now until the end of the year); or, do you mean immediately! Because I am using 64-bit LinuxMint 7 (which is the same as Jaunty Ubuntu 64-bit), and I am still not able to go to blogger.com at this point! I have no intention of reinstalling Linux just to get to use Chromium! So if you fixed it... You failed! Cause it's still not working right!
,
Jan 20 2010
heya, I'm getting the same issue, and it is somewhat frustarting. I would offer to help with reporting, but it seems they've already managed to reproduce it and track it. However, teddyhcraig, give them a chance =). You can use anothe browser in the meantime, that's what I'm doing. And I suspect that they'll mark this issue as Fixed when it's...well...fixed? Lol. Victor
,
Jan 20 2010
The following revision refers to this bug:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=36625
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r36625 | sgjesse@google.com | 2010-01-20 01:02:12 -0800 (Wed, 20 Jan 2010) | 5 lines
Changed paths:
M http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/DEPS?r1=36625&r2=36624
Update V8 to version 2.0.6.1
BUG= 32436
TEST=none
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/555001
------------------------------------------------------------------------
,
Jan 20 2010
,
Jan 20 2010
Issue 32706 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jan 20 2010
Fixed on build 36643. Thanks a lot for the quick fix.
,
Jan 21 2010
Issue 32816 has been merged into this issue.
,
Oct 12 2012
This issue has been closed for some time. No one will pay attention to new comments. If you are seeing this bug or have new data, please click New Issue to start a new bug.
,
Mar 10 2013
,
Mar 11 2013
,
Mar 13 2013
|
||||||||
| ► Sign in to add a comment | ||||||||